Endoscopic Versus Surgical Step-Up Approach for Infected Necrotizing Pancreatitis (ExTENSION): Long-term Follow-up of a Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Previous randomized trials, including the Transluminal Endoscopic Step-Up Approach Versus Minimally Invasive Surgical Step-Up Approach in Patients With Infected Pancreatic Necrosis (TENSION) trial, demonstrated that the endoscopic step-up approach might be preferred over the surgical step-up approach in patients with infected necrotizing pancreatitis based on favorable short-term outcomes. We compared long-term clinical outcomes of both step-up approaches after a period of at least 5 years. METHODS: In this long-term follow-up study, we reevaluated all clinical data on 83 patients (of the originally 98 included patients) from the TENSION trial who were still alive after the initial 6-month follow-up. The primary end point, similar to the TENSION trial, was a composite of death and major complications. Secondary end points included individual major complications, pancreaticocutaneous fistula, reinterventions, pancreatic insufficiency, and quality of life. RESULTS: After a mean follow-up period of 7 years, the primary end point occurred in 27 patients (53%) in the endoscopy group and in 27 patients (57%) in the surgery group (risk ratio [RR], 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65-1.32; P = .688). Fewer pancreaticocutaneous fistulas were identified in the endoscopy group (8% vs 34%; RR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.08-0.83). After the initial 6-month follow-up, the endoscopy group needed fewer reinterventions than the surgery group (7% vs 24%; RR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.09-0.99). Pancreatic insufficiency and quality of life did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: At long-term follow-up, the endoscopic step-up approach was not superior to the surgical step-up approach in reducing death or major complications in patients with infected necrotizing pancreatitis. However, patients assigned to the endoscopic approach developed overall fewer pancreaticocutaneous fistulas and needed fewer reinterventions after the initial 6-month follow-up. Netherlands Trial Register no: NL8571.

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: identical etiologic factors in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes.

AIMS: To compare NAFLD prevalence, distribution and its etiologic determinants in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D). METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, NAFLD was evaluated by transient elastography in adult outpatients with T1D and T2D. NAFLD was defined as hepatic steatosis with or without fibrosis. Associations between insulin resistance related factors and NAFLD and advanced fibrosis (≥ F3) were explored in T1D and T2D separately, using multivariate logistic regression models. Interaction analysis was performed to compare the associations in patients with T1D and T2D. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty patients with T1D (mean age 47 years, male 55%, mean diabetes duration 25 years, median BMI 25 kg/m2) and 100 patients with T2D (median age 67 years, male 56%, median diabetes duration 17 years, mean BMI 30 kg/m2) were included. NAFLD prevalence was 20% in patients with T1D and 76% in patients with T2D. Advanced fibrosis prevalence was 2.0% in patients with T1D and 22% in patients with T2D. In both patients with T1D and T2D, waist circumference, BMI and metabolic syndrome were positively associated, and estimated insulin sensitivity was negatively associated with the presence of NAFLD, adjusted for age, sex and diabetes duration. There was no effect modification by diabetes type for any of these associations. CONCLUSIONS: Despite differences in population characteristics and pathophysiology between T1D and T2D, insulin resistance related factors are similarly associated with NAFLD in both groups.